THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK:

Penny Wong’s ‘porkies’? “Deceived again #3: more proof that Wong faked her sea scare:
As we noted yesterday, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong this week released a suspiciously-timed
report claiming 250,000 Australian homes could be drowned by rising seas by 2100, thanks to global
warming. Her much-publicised report claimed warming could cause the seas to rise not by the 59cms
that the most gloomy IPCC model put as the upper limit, but by 1.1 metres – or even 1.90 metres.

Yesterday, with the help of reader Lazlo, I showed how Wong’s report, produced by her own department,
in fact actually told untruths about the IPCC predictions and relied on a discredited paper to justify its much
more alarmist figure.

Then in a second post, Kris Sayce, editor of Money Morning, showed even more flaws: the misrepresentation
and use of Bureau of Meteorology data which the bureau itself said was unreliable, the use of data guaranteed
to exaggerate recent rises in sea level, and a false claim that these recent rises were unprecedented.

Now reader Cohenite points out yet more flaws which turn Wong’s report into a farce: The misrepresentation
by Wong is actually worse than Andrew’s article shows; the Sayce comment about the modern satellite data
showing an increased rate of -3mm compared to the -1.7mm over the rest of the 20thC is not complete because
those satellite measurements have been reviewed in these two papers.

The Ablain et al and Cazenave et al papers which I link to above have looked at these measurements and
factored in the latest thermosteric and mass measurements. The 2008 Cazenave paper looks at the period
from 2003-2008 and finds a decomposed [into the steric and mass components] sea level rate of increase
of -2.3mm pa.

The 2009 Ablain paper looks at the period from 2005-2008 and finds a rate of increase of -.3mm pa.
During the 20thC the rate of sea level increase was -1.8mm pa. But there were periods when the rate was
more and when it was less, even negative, arguably in correlation with PDO phase shifts. This is exactly
what we are seeing since 1992. From 1992-2003 we saw a rate of increase greater than average; from
2003 we have seen a rapidly decreasing rate of increase, again arguably in correlation with PDO phase shift.

It is simply incorrect to say there is a rapidly increasing rate of sea level increase. In fact the rate is normal
and decreasing in the short term.

From the Ablain paper: Thermosteric sea level increase is from ocean heat expansion; this hasn’t been happening
since -2003 as measures of Ocean Heat Content show a cooling sea [OHC is different from sea surface
temperature which has not been showing any upward trend in any event]…

The ramifications for Wong are this; she is a minister; she has a duty to the public to present the best and
most reliable information; she has ignored the above 2 papers and a host of other relevant information.
She should resign.” – Source: Andrew Bolt’s Blog -–Thursday, 19 November, 2009

‘SORRY’ FOR THE CPRS

Ken Grundy, Naracoorte, S.A., 5271: The Great Hall in Parliament House will not be large enough when
a future Prime Minister apologises to the nation for Australia’s commitment to the Carbon Pollution Reduction
Scheme (CPRS).

He or she will admit, with regret, that global temperatures will have continued to rise and fall as usual and that
the CPRS has proven to be simply a tax. The tax of some $7 billion per annum will have meant surviving
producers have needed to raise prices. $7 billion will have been added to the cost of living, which had the
added impact of closely following the Global Financial Crisis.

A record of all MPs who vote for the CPRS will be kept so they can join the future
Prime Minister in saying “Sorry”.

MEANWHILE, ANOTHER AUSTRALIAN SCIENTIST SPEAKS OUT:

A Newcastle University professor says his research shows it is a myth carbon emissions are causing higher
temperatures, blamed for the Murray-Darling catchment drying up.

Newcastle University Associate Professor Stewart Franks is the author of a paper due to be published in
the American journal Geophysical Research Letters.

He says his research has found elevated temperatures in the Murray-Darling catchment are caused by a
combination of natural factors associated with drought and not carbon emissions … Professor Franks says
claims about increased evaporation rates and climate change impacts on the Murray-Darling Basin are entirely false.

STOP PRESS: We have just received from the Minnesota Free Market Institute a one- and-a-half hour DVD of Lord Monkton’s speech on 14th October, 2009, “Apocalypse – No!” filmed at the Climate Change Symposium. Vital viewing!
Special price $10 posted.

Another DVD… must view – “Fall of the Republic”: American folk have produced over two hours of viewing.
They warn the viewers the one-worlders will dump the American dollar when they think the timing is right – with
resulting hyperinflation, thus wiping out the American (and Australian) middle class. The issues facing Americans are
the same as those facing Australians… global governance, climate change scam, climate cops, political, corporate
and financial corruption, a rising ‘police state’ – and much more. Special price for over two hours of viewing: $12.00
posted from Heritage Books, P.O. Box 27, Happy Valley, 5159.

HOW THEY PLAN TO DESTROY THE AUSTRALIA WE LOVED
by James Reed:

The plan for the new world order was simple in the past. During war-time conditions Dr. Evatt in 1942 attempted
to implement the Commonwealth Powers Bill which aimed to give unlimited power to the Federal government by
altering the Constitution. The first attempt by Evatt was publicly howled down, so he tried again. The new bill was
criticised on the same grounds of power-grabbing by Fadden, Menzies and Hughes. The attempt was made to get
the States to grant the federal government the power, which also failed.

Today the elites have moved to wider horizons and seek to eliminate the nation
state itself, using the alleged environmental crisis (global warming) and economic
globalisation as their chief weapons.

THE CLIMATE CHANGE TREATY & THE NEW WORLD ORDER
by James Reed:

The League has already commented on the U.N’s. Copenhagen conspiracy re: the draft climate change treaty,
which attempts to set up a world government. But this is not just our opinion: Janet Albrechtsen of The
Australian (28/10/09, p.16) “Beware the U.N’s. Copenhagen Plot” writes: “The first draft of the climate treaty is
aimed at creating a world government that would tax rich countries and give to poor ones.”

The aim of the “U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change” (15 September 2009) is to set up a transnational
government with powers to control the economic, financial and environmental affairs of nations. Developed countries
must pay their “adaptation debt” to developing countries. This will probably be a global levy of 2 per cent on international
financial transactions to raise for developing countries $UDS 140 billion a year.

As of 16 November 2009, it has been reported that the 200-page draft agreement has been scrapped to be replaced
by a new provisional 15-page document. This however is not due to any change in globalist philosophy, but over a
concern that there won’t be agreement on emissions reduction. In other words, the elites moved a little too fast, too
quickly. Yet there is always a Plan B.

The push for a new Asian world order is well under way. At a meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation
group in Singapore, 15 November 2009, leaders have decided to create an Asia-Pacific free trade zone. This will
be in the context of a “new growth paradigm” that helps developing countries. Rudd, who pushed the idea of an
Asia-Pacific community based on the E.U. model, was delighted. Black president Obama declared himself the
“first Pacific president” in a speech in Tokyo on 14 November 2009.

A man with a big ego, he pushed his new world order vision basing it on his personal story i.e., (allegedly) born in
Hawaii, lived as a boy in Indonesia, etc. Yes, an attachment to foreign nations, but how much commitment to America
has he? As he says in his ego-rave The Audacity of Hope : “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds
shift in an ugly direction.”

The Asian new world order is one to be ruled by China and India. Already China has told Obama that they want
to be equal with the United States as China claims a strategic leadership role in the Asia-Pacific. With frightening
China-US trade imbalances, the pressure is now being applied to the United States.

The future new world order is a frightening one for us as it spells our racial annihilation and the end of the West.
Beyond that, the Asian tigers will not be at peace with each other. China and India, 37 years ago, fought a border
war and the entire frontier from Kashmir to Burma remains in dispute. The Chinese media frequently express the
need to punish India and regain lost lands by force. Chinese elites openly proclaim that China needs to teach India
a lesson for daring to challenge its emerging status as No 1.

In their article “War with China is Unthinkable”, Paul Dibb and Geoffrey Barker (The Australian, 24-25/10/09 p.3)
comment on the significance of the rise of China as a military power, and one which by 2030 will be the strongest
military power in Asia. U.S. forces and military bases will be open to Chinese attack. They say:

“This will herald a serious change in Australia’s strategic circumstances. Unlike the U.S., China will be neither a
democracy nor our ally. Moreover, China will be Australia’s largest trading partner and Australia will be the economic
hostage. What we will face in the decades ahead is an unapologetically authoritarian country that does nor share our
values and which will have the military power to support ambitions.” Australia, in short, will be treated as a resource
base that must be ever-open to Chinese demands.

Having said that, Dibb and Barker then back away from this dizzy abyss and say that China has its own weaknesses
such as a huge population and environmental destruction – all of which though could lead to overseas adventures.
Then they correctly note that China has nuclear capacity and Australia does not. End of story.

But, as I see it, this is the price Australia paid by following Arthur Calwell’s post-war immigration programme.
“Populate or perish” meant bringing in Mediterraneans and Southern Europeans and non-Anglos, inevitably leading
to acceptance in the 1960s of the end of the White Australia policy, and then multiculturalism and now Asianisation.
A smaller, racially and culturally homogenous country, armed with nuclear weapons, would not have to become the
slave of China.

Jeremy and Nancy Lee’s latest DVD – available from both Heritage Book Services:

• “Retell the Story”: a 1999 presentation on world events, up to that time, by Jeremy to a group of young
people in Brisbane, Queensland, and

• “A + B: Mending a Mortgaged World”: Jeremy asks… how can the world possibly get out of financial
debt by issuing more financial debt ?

BOOKS…

• “The Climate Caper” by Professor Garth W. Paltridge. Is Prof. Paltridge on track when he asks is the
manipulation of the global warming issue the ultimate example of political correctness? Judge for yourself.
$25.00 plus postage.

• “Heaven+Earth: The Missing Science” by Ian Plimer. Professor Plimer turns the ‘climate change’ advocates
into laughing stocks and does so with elegance, thoroughness and indisputable logic. In a non-scientific view, he has
effectively put an end to the debate. We now have to wait for the rest of the world to catch up, particularly the media.
Price $40 plus postage from both Heritage Book Services.

POPULATION CONSUMES GROWTH PERFORMANCE: “At last. Australia is out of recession. “What?”
I hear you ask, “I thought Australia had escaped the recession.” Not so. Those eagerly awaited National Account
or GDP figures which came out this week do not tell the fully story. And, incidentally, this is the 50th anniversary
of the publication of those figures. Australia has been in recession since about mid-2008, but the economists will
not tell you that.

You see, the GOP figures add up national income and determine whether the economy has expanded or contracted.
But they do not account for population growth. In the past year population growth has been greater than the growth
in the economy. So income per head has gone down, not up as the Government and economists would mislead you
into believing. Now you know why you have been feeling the pinch.

I hasten to add that this is not the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ fault, It just produces the figures. Unfortunately,
it cannot do everything at once. The national account figure is seen to be more important than the income-per-head
figure so is done first.

Growing at astonishing poverty-causing rates: But you can do back-of-the-envelope figures. The population
is growing at an astonishing 1.9 per cent – at poverty-causing Third World rates. But between mid last year and
now, the economy as a whole was growing at less than that rate. So we were going backwards. It is now growing
at an annual rate of 2.4 per cent, just ahead of population.